It seems you're agreeing with the article even if you don't realise it.

The article says the attack was succesful, but not significant. A point you don't seem to oppose.

The point of the quote is that IF a terrorist organization was able to launch an actually crippling attack, they would have. Since they haven't, odds are they can't.

If you read on a little bit, he clearly states that this CAN change. But, for the time being, the abscence of a crippling attack is evidence that terrorists are not yet able to execute a such.

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
Please enter the two words below to help prevent spam.
Incorrect please try again
Enter the words above: Enter the numbers you hear:

 

Copyright © 2010 threatpost.com | Terms of Service | Privacy