Reply to comment
Newsletter Sign-up
Newsletter Sign-up
Security news and analysis with expert opinion and perspective from the Threatpost editors.
Take Our Poll
Listen to Latest Podcasts
-
-
You are missing some Flash content that should appear here! Perhaps your browser cannot display it, or maybe it did not initialize correctly.
-
You are missing some Flash content that should appear here! Perhaps your browser cannot display it, or maybe it did not initialize correctly.


It seems you're agreeing with the article even if you don't realise it.
The article says the attack was succesful, but not significant. A point you don't seem to oppose.
The point of the quote is that IF a terrorist organization was able to launch an actually crippling attack, they would have. Since they haven't, odds are they can't.
If you read on a little bit, he clearly states that this CAN change. But, for the time being, the abscence of a crippling attack is evidence that terrorists are not yet able to execute a such.