An attorney in the infamous 2015 Jeep hack predicts that more lawsuits related to IoT security are looming in the future.
When it comes to IoT security, legal action is “a matter of when not if.”
That’s according to Ijay Palansky, an attorney in Armstrong Teasdale’s Litigation practice group. Palansky represented plaintiffs and class members who alleged in the infamous 2015 Jeep hacking class-action lawsuit that the 3G “infotainment” center in those cars were vulnerable to hacking.
Threatpost talked to Palansky about impending IoT legal issues and what to expect.
Download direct here.
Investigation reveals device sector is problem plagued when it comes to security bugs.
Researchers predict software security will continue to struggle to keep up with cloud and IoT in the new year.
Industrial, factory and medical gear remain largely unpatched when it comes to the URGENT/11 and CDPwn groups of vulnerabilities.
Infosec Insider content is written by a trusted community of Threatpost cybersecurity subject matter experts. Each contribution has a goal of bringing a unique voice to important cybersecurity topics. Content strives to be of the highest quality, objective and non-commercial.
Sponsored Content is paid for by an advertiser. Sponsored content is written and edited by members of our sponsor community. This content creates an opportunity for a sponsor to provide insight and commentary from their point-of-view directly to the Threatpost audience. The Threatpost editorial team does not participate in the writing or editing of Sponsored Content.
