Uncategorized


BBC botnet buy: What were they thinking?

By Roel Schouwenberg
As Dancho Danchev pointed out, the BBC leased itself a botnet [zdnet.com]. I couldn’t quite believe it when I read it. The BBC, arguably one of the very best TV producers in the world, surely should have known better? There are so many things wrong about this that I hardly know where to start.
Firstly, given their figures, they seem to have spent quite an amount of money purchasing the botnet. Regardless of how much the total sum was, they sponsored the underground economy. Paying money to criminals (for illegal goods) is not only unethical but also considered illegal in most countries. The BBC broke the law right there and then already, not when they actively started using the botnet.

Employee stole data from Sprint

Sprint has sent letters to thousands of its customers informing them that a former employee compromised their personal account data over the course of two months in 2008 and 2009. Brian Krebs [Security Fix] says that the company mailed warnings to several thousand customers and that the breach could have been far worse had Sprint not recently upgraded its security controls.

Economic crisis hitting security budgets hard

The economy is still terrible and will likely continue to get worse in the near term, and the picture is just as ugly for enterprise security staffs. Peter Kuper, a longtime investment banker and software analyst at Morgan Stanley, said security shops can expect to see their budgets be flat at best this year and cut sharply next year for the first time in more than half a decade.


Tech security company Fortify and security consulting firm Cigital are getting ready to release a set of best practices that tech companies and other businesses can follow to ensure that the software they develop is secure.

The authors developed the model by studying the security practices at Google, Microsoft, Adobe, and other tech companies, as well as non-tech companies that write their own software like Wells Fargo, and Depository Trust & Clearing Corp.

By Andrew Storms

Transparency is a common theme in politics and Wall Street these days. The 2008 elections, dealings of TARP, financial institutions run a-muck are all places where we hear the word transparency bandied about on a daily basis. While many security professionals speak about transparency when it comes to information security, very few definitions fit the overarching idea of transparency. I believe that the time has come for information security professionals to both dig deeper and out of the idea of transparency to gain a better understanding of this concept.

Brian Krebs’ terrific reporting on the targeted malware attacks against small businesses in the U.S. continues today with a closer look at the way “money mules” operate and their roles in the cybercrime operation.
In this article, Krebs interviews a “money mule” and shows the layers of online job recruitment, the sign-up process that includes bank account details and the way money is siphoned from stolen bank accounts and wired to international locations.  This is a must read article [washingtonpost.com]

The number of identification theft cases surged in 2008, according to a report (.pdf) based on the Federal Trade Commission’s annual data. 

In 2008, ID theft was by far the biggest complaint to the FTC, representing 26 percent of complaints. The next biggest complaint — third party and creditor debt collection scams — represented only 9 percent of complaints.

With the economy cratering, staffs and budgets being cut and resources scarce, cloud computing has quickly become the prettiest girl at the prom. IT managers love its convenience and power and accounting departments are quite fond of its cost efficiencies.

But what of security and privacy? Where do they factor into the equation, if at all?

Tens of millions of people have lost their jobs in recent months, and a huge number of them are taking proprieatry company data with them when they leave, according to a new study. The study shows that almost 60 percent of people who leave or are fired from a job are swiping information.

Brian Krebs at The Washington Post has the full story on the report, which is the work of the Ponemon Institute.