New Remotely Exploitable Bug Found in Internet Explorer
Another serious remotely exploitable bug in Internet Explorer has cropped up, this one related to the way that IE handles a specific DLL library on pages that reference CSS files. There also is publicly available exploit code for the new bug.
The vulnerability was disclosed initially on the Full Disclosure mailing list on Wednesday when someone posted exploit code for the IE bug. The flaw affects IE 8, IE 7 and IE 6 running on most of the currently supported versions of Windows, including Windows 7, Windows Vista and Windows XP SP3.
"A vulnerability has been identified in Microsoft Internet Explorer, which could be exploited by remote attackers to take complete control of a vulnerable system. This issue is caused by a use-after-free error within the 'mshtml.dll' library when processing a web page referencing a CSS (Cascading Style Sheets) file that includes various '@import' rules, which could allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a specially crafted web page," an analysis of the bug by Vupen says. "VUPEN has confirmed this vulnerability with Microsoft Internet Explorer 8 on Windows 7, Windows Vista SP2 and Windows XP SP3, and with Internet Explorer 7 and 6 on Windows XP SP3."
Editor's Pick
There is no patch available for the vulnerability right now. Microsoft is fixing a separate remotely exploitable Internet Explorer bug in next week's monthly Patch Tuesday update.
"Over the past month, Microsoft and our MAPP partners actively monitored the threat landscape surrounding this vulnerability and the total number of exploit attempts we monitored remained pretty low. Furthermore, customers running Internet Explorer 8 remained protected by default due to the extra protection provided by Data Execution Prevention (DEP)," Microsoft's Mike Reavey said in a blog post about the December patch release.
That IE bug first came to light in early November and attackers have been using it in targeted attacks since then. Microsoft officials said that the attacks have been less successful than they might have thought, perhaps because the combination of DEP and ASLR on IE 8 on newer versions of Windows is mitigating the effects of the attacks.
"The attack patterns for this vulnerability have been somewhat unusual. The Friday after we began our tracking effort, we saw our first spike in activity, predominantly targeting users in Korea, and secondarily attempting to exploit users in China. Although attacks in China trended down over subsequent weeks, we continued to see weekend-related spikes in Korea. However, after the second weekend spike, even these attack attempts continued to trend down, revealing a smaller number of attack attempts each coming weekend," Holly Stewart of the Microsoft Malware Protection Center said in a blog post. "Over the past few days, attack attempts in China have been on the rise, again, the downward trend that occurred during the first month is unusual for an 0-day vulnerability such as this one. One explanation might be that the attackers did not achieve the success rate that they had hoped."
Commenting on this Article is closed.
Today's Most Popular
- Anatomy of a LulzSec Attack 'Singles Out' Web 2.0 Weakness
- OPINION: Are Anonymous Members Forged in the Crucible of IT Compliance?
- Defense Contractor Northrop Grumman Hiring For Offensive Cyber Ops
- Google to Notify Users of DNSChanger Infections Ahead of July 9 Deadline
- Facebook Cancellation Malware Disguised As Adobe Update Making Rounds
Most Commented Stories
Newsletter Sign-up
Take Our Poll
Listen to Latest Podcasts
-
-
You are missing some Flash content that should appear here! Perhaps your browser cannot display it, or maybe it did not initialize correctly.
-
You are missing some Flash content that should appear here! Perhaps your browser cannot display it, or maybe it did not initialize correctly.




Comments
Have you actually confirmed Vupen's claims of code execution in the new CSS import 0day? From everything else I've seen, it's a DoS only. Vupen is the only one claiming RCE.
Yes, I did. I talked with a researcher this morning who confirmed that it's remotely exploitable, though it's somewhat difficult to execute.