Spammers Moving to Disposable Domains
Spammers and the botnet operators they're allied with are continuing to adapt their techniques to evade security technologies, and now are using what amount to disposable domains for their activities. A new report shows that the spammers are buying dozens of domains at a time and moving from one to another as often as several times a day to prevent shutdowns.
Spammers for years have been buying domains in bulk and using them for both redirections to other, often malicious, sites and for locations to set up quick e-commerce sites for sales of pills, pirated software, fake watches or whatever goods they're pushing that day. Anti-spam services and email filters typically use static lists of known malicious domains or ones known to be used by spammers.
That approach worked well early on in the fight against spam, but as the spammers have analyzed the defenses deployed against them, their tactics have become much more devious and effective of late. New research by security firm M86 Security Labs shows that the amount of time that a spammer uses a given domain is basically a day or less. The company looked at 60 days worth of data from their customers and found that more than 70 percent of the domains used by spammers are active for a day or less.
Recommended Reads

That's a major change from the days when large-scale spam operations would buy a couple of dozen random domains, set them up in a bulletproof hosting environment and use them for months at a time. The ease with which these groups can buy domains and move from one to another within a few minutes represents a serious challenge for law enforcement and anti-spam groups. There have been some successes in the fight against spam in recent years, specifically the takedown of McColo. But there are thousands and thousands of smaller operators around the world, making spam a very distributed problem.
As Internet threats go, spam is not exactly sexy. (OK, some of it is.) It's old, it's boring and it's really seen as more of a nuisance than a threat. And that's part of the current problem that spam presents: It is, in fact, a threat and it's being overlooked in favor or more buzzworthy attacks with three-letter acronyms.But spam volume remains high, accounting for roughly 88 percent of all email in the first half of 2010, according to the M86 report.
Spam continues to be a major mechanism for spreading malware and is also a key piece of the botnet puzzle. Most of the major botnets are used to deliver spam, especially pharmaceutical spam, and some of those messages also contain malware. That malware often is a copy of a bot program that will then turn the infected machine into a spam engine, perpetuating the cycle.
Kaspersky Lab Channel and Alliance Partners
Newsletter Sign-up
Newsletter Sign-up
Security news and analysis with expert opinion and perspective from the Threatpost editors.
Take Our Poll
Listen to Latest Podcasts
-
-
You are missing some Flash content that should appear here! Perhaps your browser cannot display it, or maybe it did not initialize correctly.
-
You are missing some Flash content that should appear here! Perhaps your browser cannot display it, or maybe it did not initialize correctly.


Comments
This is *not* news. Spammers have been doing this for at least a year, quite possibly longer.
This not-even-remotely-new "disposable domain" phenomenon is spammers' reaction to the effectiveness of URI blacklists.
It is a sad commentary on spam "research" when it's this far behind the curve.
Ban windows, and botnets will disappear forever. It really is that simple. Force m$ to take security seriously, or shut them down and force people to migrate away from windows.
Of course, none of those things are going to happen, since several industries, including security software, spam, and microsoft itself, are based on the fact that computers are awfully insecure.
Its simple. Just add a new rule (which has to be coded) for SMTP to not except incoming emails from any domain if that domain is less than a month old. Obviously this number days/months, etc can be configurable.
I work for M86 security and its great to see all the comments, and we completely agree with the comments around this not being major news, and its not this has been happening for quite a while, this is only one very small statistic from our latest security update report we have published, see our security labs site. The far more interesting opportunity to combat spam is not from hosting take downs or even disabling C&C of spambots, its tackling the affiliate programs, in this same report we state that 67% of all spam we track is promoting the Canadian Pharmacy affiliate program and the top 2 spambots pretty much exclusively, if we can address that we might finally have a longer lasting impact on spam volumes?
OK - as the admin of a small but active E-mail forwarding service I'm thinking about doing a "whois" on domains (cache the answers) and not allowing connections from any that are not at least X days old - how does that sound?
Personally I think 365 days is a reasonable number for X
I completely agree with you.
Post new comment